Grand Canyon

Grand Canyon photo © 2007 Rev. Glenn Jenks
Back

03/12/2008

E-pistle for 3-14-08

by Bishop Kirk S. Smith

The spring House of Bishops Meeting in Camp Allen has just concluded and I want share my impressions with you before I head back to Phoenix. We have enjoyed six days of fellowship, prayer (we worshipped together three times a day), great preaching, and teaching against the backdrop of springtime in rural Texas. I even managed to join some colleagues for a couple of hours of horseback-riding!

Much of our time together was spent on the hearing of reports and presentations, but the meeting was framed by two very emotional bookends.

The first was the announcement that in spite of intensive lobbying by many bishops of our church, the Archbishop of Canterbury has decided not to permit Bishop Gene Robinson of New Hampshire to participate in any capacity at the upcoming Lambeth Conference in July. Although Bishop Robinson was the only American bishop not to receive a formal invitation, it had been hoped that a way could be found to have him present in an unofficial capacity. This news was greeted with great sadness by most of the House, and we are working to find ways support our brother during our time in England, and especially to invite our counterparts in the Anglican Communion to meet with him. I invite you to read all the documents that are posted on the Episcopal Life website, including Bishop Robinson's very moving response to the Lambeth decision, as well as a resolution passed by the House in support of him. Whether one agrees with him or not, it is important to remember that he is a duly elected Bishop and that his exclusion is hurtful not only to him, but to the integrity of the American church.

The other sad moment in our time together came when we took action to depose two bishops of the church who had violated their ordination vows by working to take parishes out of the Episcopal Church: Bishop John-David Scofield of San Joaquin, and Bishop William Cox, retired Suffragan of Maryland. This action was taken after long moments of prayer and silent reflection on the floor of the House. All of us wished to be as charitable and forgiving as possible, but the fact remains that both bishops have worked for many years to separate themselves from our church and in doing so have caused great harm to their dioceses. We consider our action to be a recognition of an existing situation, and not a punitive action.

Many of the presentations we heard focused, appropriately enough, on reconciliation and on our need to go to the Lambeth conference in as open, humble, and cooperative way as possible. We spent an entire session learning about "faith-based reconciliation" and how it has been successfully practiced in our own church around the world. We also renewed our commitment to anti-racism training.

As always, there were a number of practical items. We can expect, for example, some changes in our clergy medical insurance program that should result in considerable savings. We also received some training in dealing with the media which will come in handy when we are interviewed by reporters this summer.

I continue to be impressed by the great wealth of talent and the diverse thinking of the bishops of the American church, and their willingness to undertake decisions prayerfully and seriously.

A prayer used by our chaplains at worship each day sums it all up:

Give to your Church, O God,
a bold vision and a daring charity,
a refreshed wisdom and a courteous understanding,
that the eternal message of your Son
may be acclaimed as the good news of the age;
through him who makes all things new,
even Jesus Christ our Lord, Amen.

+Kirk


Comments:


Thank you, Bishop. News reports are rarely accurate. Bill+




Posted by: William Young


Perhaps I'm missing something here, but wouldn't a better way to support Gene Robinson be for ECUSA to boycott Lambeth? If they are rejecting one of our duly elected bishops, aren't they rejecting all of us?




Posted by: Holly Matherly


Thanks for sharing all those meeting moments with us. We like to know what you are doing and where you are attending meetings and the outcome of those meetings. You summed it up succinctly. mak




Posted by: Marilyn Kliewer


Excluding Bishop Gene Robinson form Lambeth is not hurtful to the integrety of the American Episcopal Church but to the integrety of the Archbishop. Ahurtful as we may feel our integrety stands firm.




Posted by: Ben Somerville


A fantastic prayer! A lot of di




Posted by: Matt Marino


I don't believe he should have been made a Bishop in the first place, so I don't recognize him as one, and just because one mistake was made doesn't mean it should be followed with another just because we did it before. The entire "Robinson situation" is a drag on the ECUS and just accelerating the downward spiral of our membership numbers (and income!). If a smaller but (in the mind of too many..) "better" ECUS is your target, you're right on path to achieving it. I've heard it said "Be careful what you wish for; you just might get it...."




Posted by: Fred Keller


Kirk: The third really point of grief for me re: Lambeth Conference is no American bishop has chosen to stand with the Bishop of New Hampshire, stay home, and boycott a dispicable decision by Canterbury. Shalom, Paul Buckwalter




Posted by: Paul Buckwalter


It is a tough time for our beloved church, and you and your colleages in the house of bishops continue to be in my prayers. The San Juaquin situation is particularly distressing to me because my daughter and her family have been associated with St. Michael's Church in Ridgecrest for almost twenty years. They now attend the Lutheran church, which I find very sad. Anyway, in the Lord's time it will all work out. When the Archbishop of Canterbury receives a spine transplant there may be greater cause for hope. Elaine and I send our kind personal regards. Charles




Posted by: Charles Crane


I am so sad that the Archbishop has given in to the pressure in not including Bishop Robinson in the conference. Praise God that you and others are listening to God and giving him the support and Love that as followers of Christ you are called to do. God Bless your service and calling. Ruth Hobbs+ Kingman, AZ




Posted by: Stan Hobbs


Are Bishop Schofield and Bishop Cox still invited as full participants at Lambeth 2008? If so, do you expect that to change as a result of action taken by the House of Bishops to depose them? Thank you for keeping us informed. May we continue to pray for reconciliation within the Anglican Communion of all Christians alienated by present divisiveness.




Posted by: Patricia Klemme


Thank you for your thoughts, and the references to read the thoughts of others, especially Bishop Robinson. I confess I was moved to tears of sadness that the Archbishop, in his leadership role in the Anglican Communion, has sided with love of rules and dogmatic intepretations of scripture rather than unconditional love. I pray we in this branch of the church hold fast to our commitment to love the person, be open to understanding what we cannot understand from our own lives and experience, and will not presume to be the power of judgment. Thanks for your reminder about Gary Wills book; I found it last year, began to read, but was distracted, in part by a sense I would be getting more from it had he rephrased his title impact to say "What Jesus meant to me." I am a troublemaker, I suppose, in that I find faith a deeply personal matter, and respect others' faith as meaningful to them, and want the same respect in return. I will take another turn at Wills' book; I had a lot on my mind and did not do it justice, I'm sure. God bless you in your leadership role; I suspect you are a visionary who not only sees the bigger picture, but commits to finding resources and ways to move forward. Helen Cornell, Good Shepherd, Cave Creek




Posted by: Helen Cornell


I would like you to know that I support the stand the bishops have taken. I wish it could be different for Gene Robinson, but in a homophobic world it will probably be awhile before people become more tolerant. I'm in the Episcopal church because of it's tolerance for differences in people and it's emphasis on our ability to think for ourselves. God bless.




Posted by: Patricia Romero


I would like you to know that I support the stand the bishops have taken. I wish it could be different for Gene Robinson, but in a homophobic world it will probably be awhile before people become more tolerant. I'm in the Episcopal church because of it's tolerance for differences in people and it's emphasis on our ability to think for ourselves. God bless.




Posted by: Patricia Romero


When a priest or bishop is deposed do they still receive their pension from PECUSA? It seems to me that if a clergyperson actively leaves the organized Episcopal Church (not just changes vocations) there should be a financial consequence. The clergyperson could be given all his/her pension monies acrued up to that date in a lump sum. But to continue to receive significant checks from an organization they have actively disowned seems in itself hypocritical. I realize this would be complex to impliment.




Posted by: The Rev. Pamela Mulac, Ph.D.


I am confused. You talk of destruction and exclusion. Who now is left at the table? What is this message of a more perfect Love? Peace was found at the first Christian skirmish, focus on the children and the poor as common ground.




Posted by: Michael Paar


Post Your Comment